F-Euler analysis

F-Euler calculation performing calculation of factor acr by which the design loads would have to be increased to cause elastic instability in a global mode. Theoretical case acr is calculating by meaning:

acr = Fcr / Fed

where:

Fcr - the elastic critical buckling load for global instability mode based on initial elastic stiffnesses

Fed - the design loading on the structure

 

F-Euler stability analysis is automatically performed parallel using Linear analysis calculation case of (NEN-)EN and existing Steel sections in the project, but could be turned off using "F-Euler" checkmark located in Advanced analysis dialog window
Representation of F-Euler calculation results and visualization of buckling forms  is available only technical module No. 140 (Euler Buckling load analysis) is on
Buckling load for global instability mode Fcr is corresponding  the design loading Fed on the whole structure, not on the some structural element in particular 
Calculation of acr doesn't take in to account 3D effects (accompanying loading) and torsion
Calculating of acr for the different structures and/or structural parts defined in one project file is treating these parts as one structure, while answer which one structure or structural part cause instability isn't trivial:
 
acr calculation

 

Calculation of F-Euler stability is based on two stages. On the first stage linear calculation of entire system is performed. As result all the forces and displacements including axial forces as  Nx is calculated. Using this calculation of F-Euler is starting.

For the calculation on F-Euler is presumed, that axial force in the elements is changing proportionally the parameter a>0. Changing in potential energy of entire system taken in to account influence of axial forces aN is analyzed:

F-Euler calculation                                  (1)

 

where:

P – potential energy of an element taking in to account influence of axial force

E – Youngs modulus

I2, I3 – Moments of inertia (I2 = Iz, I3 = Iy)

u = (u1, u2, u3), v = (v1, v2, v3) – displacements:

u1, v1 – displacements in Х direction

u2, u3, v2, v3 – displacements in main directions of cross section

l – element length

 

Derivatives in Х' direction:

Derivatives in Х' direction

 

Let define H as set of functions U for that potential energy P(u) could be estimated and that satisfy kinematic determined boundary conditions. Also for such a boundary conditions on u v H, following requirement should be stated as true:

 

a(u, u) > 0                                                                           (2)

 

Inequality (2) in fact is describing geometrically stable system. Taking in to account (1), entire system is stable, in case for all u v H following inequality is true:

 

P(u, a) > 0                                                                           (3)

 

And entire system is unstable, in case  for all u v H, U ≠ 0:

 

P(u, a) < 0                                                                           (4)

 

Loss of stability is met for l0, u0 v H, u0 ≠ 0:

 

P(ucr, acr) = 0                                                                      (5)

 

Also for all a < acr inequality (3) should be satisfied as true.

Factor acr > 0, is satisfying (5), is called "Stability criterion". Stability criterion acr is used for Steel code check (NEN-EN 1993-1-1, EN 1993-1-1 chapter 5.2.1).

 

Example

Single project file calculating different structural parts – columns:

  • Calculating single column loaded by F=1500kN:
Calculating single column loaded by F=1500kN

 

acr = 7.14 < 10 -  GNL calculation is needed  (NEN-EN 1993-1-1 chapter 5.2.1)

 

  • Calculating single column loaded by F=100kN:
Calculating single column loaded by F=100kN

 

acr= 107.16 > 10 - LE is sufficient (NEN-EN 1993-1-1 chapter 5.2.1)

 

  • Single project calculating two structural elements – columns:
Single project calculating two structural elements Single project calculating two structural elements

acr = 7.14 < 10 -  GNL calculation is needed  (NEN-EN 1993-1-1 chapter 5.2.1)

 

Conclusion:

Conservative approach is taken. In case of separate structures, the decisive structure part determines acr.

For current example the whole structure should be calculated GNL :

  1. Otherwise the structure should be split in separate projects to calculate some parts GNL and others LE;
  2. GNL approach is always better then LE in case of steel code checking, only calculation is more time consuming.